Search for: "University System v. State" Results 5141 - 5160 of 8,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was no more apparent than the Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Geeyoung Min and Alexander M. Krischik
Second, since the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:45 am
He acknowledged there is no real comparison in the U.S. system, not even how the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
That’s where 1st Judicial District Court Judge Kathy Seeley, a state judge, will oversee a 10-day trial in the case of Held v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
Justice GangulySupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Maharashtra University of Health and others v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:26 am by Lorene Park
’” Summary judgment was granted on his ADA and state law claims (Morriss v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm by Giles Peaker
For purposes of continuous residence, children spending time away from home for education due to periods of study such as at university and people who have moved away up to 3 times due to the requirements of their job will be disregarded. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Patent system classified according to subject matter; a different endeavor. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:55 am by Jan von Hein
We have already alerted our readers to the preliminary reference triggered by the Estonian Supreme Court concerning violations of personality rights of legal persons committed via the internet (Bolagsupplysningen OÜ, Ingrid Ilsjan v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
It has always been suspected that the tabloid press’s almost universal antipathy towards the 1998 Act, which in theory at least should be popular as it protects citizens against nasty state intrusion, was inspired by the fear that the privacy rights it bolstered, despite the competing right to freedom of expression, would prevent them doing their jobs. [read post]