Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 14,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 8:44 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:01 am
”Briefly: At Angry Bear, Beverly Mann predicts that the Court’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:45 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:23 pm
The Cargill v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
Readers of this blog know that I’m interested in name change cases, and last week brought another from the Oklahoma Supreme Court, Hemphill v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:36 pm
Petition was filed in Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 7:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:35 pm
This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.2. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:44 pm
The following Mass v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:41 pm
Ruling unanimously on February 7 in Ornstein v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:11 am
Constitution's Second Amendment: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
Volkman, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am
But that may change this Term in Friedrichs v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
The party bearing the burden of proof (usually plaintiff) has to ask the right questions to the prescribing physician. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:08 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
The removing party bears the burden of establishing that removal was appropriate, and “the removal statute is strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. [read post]
