Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 5161 - 5180 of 21,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
  It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
For the first time Parliament and the British public will be able to debate mass surveillance powers like bulk interception, bulk hacking, and the data-mining of bulk personal datasets” The ObiterJ blog had a post summarising some the early reactions to the Bill from a variety of commentators The initial reaction of the Open Rights Group was that the draft bill was a missed opportunity to rein in the surveillance state. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 7:08 pm
  Often, the GC does not reveal its financial state to the parties it contracts with know of its financial state until it is too late. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am by Christine Nielsen
State Senator Stewart Greenleaf (R-Montgomery/Bucks), with the cooperation of Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, is reintroducing comprehensive antitrust legislation - Senate Bill 1565 - that stalled in the judiciary committee during the last legislative session. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am by Matt Sundquist
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]