Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 21,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Further, said the Appellate Division, in Daily Gazette Co. v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145, the Court of Appeals held that, in the context of a FOIL disclosure of an officer's personnel records, preventing such disclosure requires more than merely demonstrating that the document "may be used" to evaluate performance.PBA had argued that the body-worn-camera was designed, in part, for performance evaluation purposes and is "clearly 'of… [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:40 pm
In Robinson v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:36 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:36 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:53 am
**Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiffs' petition after finding that they had failed to make the necessary disclosures to a governmental body required by the provisions of §75-b. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:53 am
**Supreme Court dismissed Plaintiffs' petition after finding that they had failed to make the necessary disclosures to a governmental body required by the provisions of §75-b. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:59 am
See Turner v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am
” In an earlier article, both Balkin and Levinson defined crisis as: [A] potentially decisive turning point in the direction of the constitutional order, a moment at which the order threatens to break down, just as the body does in a medical crisis. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:25 pm
Robb v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm
In Tracy v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 10:03 am
In Ehrlich, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:17 pm
In Rudd v Bridle [2019] EWHC 893 (QB), Warby J tried a number of issues arising out of a data subject access request (“DSAR”) under s.7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (“the DPA 1998”). [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Beyer’s unpublished manuscript entitled Controlling Body Disposition: The Law and the Macabre is cited in the following article: Meredith M. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am
Genus Lifesciences Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:07 am
Board of Forensic Document Examiners, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 2:57 am
Lecat’s Ventriloscope v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 2:34 pm
Montgomery County, Maryland v. [read post]