Search for: "Class Action Defense"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 12,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 9:08 am
* the purported class action of Righthaven victims fizzled out with Righthaven’s demise. * Steve Gibson, Righthaven’s principal, is still practicing law in Nevada. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Code 13A-10-15 classifies the crime as a Class C felony, punishable by between 2 and 20 years in prison. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 6:20 am
The court disagreed that self-certification was impossible; ConAgra’s position would “effectively prohibit class actions involving low priced consumer goods—the very type of claims that would not be filed individually—thereby upending ‘[t]he policy at the very core of the class action mechanism. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:18 am
Thirty-four million received compensation through class actions. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:30 am
Consider, for example, the aggregation techniques that courts in complex disputes have employed: class actions that limit participation rights in return for the promise of adequate representation and MDL proceedings whose bellwether trials are designed to channel most cases into settlement and whose settlement structures take their inspiration from administrative agencies and insurance companies. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Code 13A-10-15 classifies the crime as a Class C felony, punishable by between 2 and 20 years in prison. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Int'l, 85 S.W.3d 171, 174-75 (Tex. 2002) (per curiam) (defendants did not waive arbitration by supporting plaintiffs' inclusion in a federal class action whose members were not subject to arbitration, and moving, inter alia, to dismiss in that action); In re Bruce Terminix Co., 988 S.W.2d 702, 704 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam) (defendant did not waive arbitration by its delay and discovery requests, when the responses were insufficient to show prejudice); EZ Pawn… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Int'l, 85 S.W.3d 171, 174-75 (Tex. 2002) (per curiam) (defendants did not waive arbitration by supporting plaintiffs' inclusion in a federal class action whose members were not subject to arbitration, and moving, inter alia, to dismiss in that action); In re Bruce Terminix Co., 988 S.W.2d 702, 704 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam) (defendant did not waive arbitration by its delay and discovery requests, when the responses were insufficient to show prejudice); EZ Pawn… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
The News and Observer reports here that “[a] Superior Court judge has agreed that dozens of North Carolina magistrates can move forward with a class-action lawsuit that contends a state pay freeze since 2009 constitutes a contractual breach. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 3:16 am
In order to finance the project Cadplaz Sponsors was selling Class B Capital stock in Cadman Towers, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:52 pm
Such litigation is increasingly common with many cases gaining national notoriety as class action lawsuits. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:59 am
Violation of the law would be a Class-B misdemeanor. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
The memo, drafted by attorneys at the corporate defense firm Mayer Brown LLP, determined that class actions do not provide a significant benefit to [...] [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
The court didn’t have to address the First Amendment or statutory defenses for depicting sporting events, because it found §301 preemption. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
As I have said time and time again, these defendants need to identify their defense and implement it immediately. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 11:17 pm
And there’s a cause of action for disparate impact. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Class actions are useful when a number of plaintiffs have similar injuries stemming from a similar (or, in mass disasters, identical) incident and the expected defenses are also similar. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
[New York Law Journal] * Remember that BARBRI antitrust class-action settlement that was reached almost a decade ago? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
According to the complaint, Defendant unsuccessfully asked these sites to remove Plaintiff’s comments, sent Plaintiff invoices purporting to charge $100 per day for the posting of these comments, and threatened to file a copyright infringement, breach of contract, and defamation suit if the comments were not removed from the sites.Several of the dentist’s patients filed a class action suit in November 2011 in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), claiming that, even… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
“By identifying and narrowing the type of information protected under the CMIA, the decision will likely have a lasting effect on the healthcare industry in California and in future litigation as other courts wrestle with the issue,” said Paul Karlsgodt, Leader of the Class Action Defense team. [read post]
