Search for: "County v. State" Results 5161 - 5180 of 33,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 2:29 pm
Case Name: Northfork Citizens for Responsible Dev. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee alleges unlawful retaliation after reporting the unauthorized use of a State computer database by another employeeGorman v Rensselaer County et al, USCA Second Circuit, No.17-1120-cvJohn Gorman alleged that the Rensselaer County defendants in this Civil Rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee alleges unlawful retaliation after reporting the unauthorized use of a State computer database by another employeeGorman v Rensselaer County et al, USCA Second Circuit, No.17-1120-cvJohn Gorman alleged that the Rensselaer County defendants in this Civil Rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 191 AD3d… [read post]