Search for: "Davis v. State"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 6,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
Singh v Weayou [2017] EWHC 2102 (QB) (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
" Stevens leaves a diverse legal legacy, authoring landmark decisions ranging from Reno v ACLU, the 1997 decision that anointed the internet with broad First Amendment protection, to Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council [1984], which has guided the administrative state ever since. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Davis, 2014 IL App (4th) 121040 (citing People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm
No specific showing of prejudice was required in Davis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Then, on 5 May 2022, the landlord’s solicitors wrote to Mr B enclosing a section 21 notice and stating ‘we are advised your deposit was returned to you’. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
Unlike the position in some of the State Supreme Courts,[2] leave to serve outside Australia[3] was required before service (FCR r 10.43(2)). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
Lee v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) US Patents –… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) US Patents –… [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
V. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:56 pm
In any event, Adkins v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
Read the warning from the State Department here. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
" An expert for i4i stated that various elements of the WORD products constituted a single data structure because of their physical and logical interrelationships. [read post]
