Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 5161 - 5180 of 16,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by John-Paul Boyd
Lorri Yasenik Child & Family Therapy Services in Calgary Patricia Hébert, QC, of the law firm Gordon Zwaenepoel in Edmonton Dr. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
The post Licensed ND Subject to Discipline for Offering “Shots” and Falsely Advertising Professional Services appeared first on Michael H Cohen Law Group | Healthcare Lawyers | Life Sciences | FDA & FTC Law. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:25 pm
It does not matter if the applicant is graduating in June and will began their employment in September. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:31 am by Eric Goldman
The civil claims would be subject to Section 230’s immunity, but the statute would expressly reiterate what Section 230 already says: that it doesn’t apply if the defendant was responsible, in whole or part, for the content. d) it would create mandatory restitution for victims of (b). e) Section 230 would exclude any civil claims where the victim can prove a violation of the federal sex trafficking crime. f) Section 230 would exclude any state criminal prosecution… [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 5:56 pm by Ryan McKeen
That said, Connecticut does allow Uber drivers to work long hours: up to fourteen consecutive hours, and up to sixteen hours in a twenty-four hour period. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Does the Senator know of any Senator who wrote the committee report? [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Julian Ouellet
Goertz and H., eds., Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), 113-145.4 G. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Julian Ouellet
Goertz and H., eds., Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), 113-145.4 G. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court of Appeals concluded that §78u-6(h) does not necessitate recourse to the SEC prior to gaining "whistle blower" status, and it accorded deference to the SEC's regulation, citing Chevron U. [read post]