Search for: "E v. G"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 5,885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2009, 1:44 pm
Malone, Robert G. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Contents include:Peter E. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD… [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
(g) An argument that requiring the boys to be vaccinated in that case violates their rights, and uses them merely as means to other social ends of social utility. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:15 am
2010 Benefit Plan Contribution Limits 401(a)(17)/ 404(l) Annual Compensation 245,000 402(g)(1) Elective Deferrals (Your 401(k) Contribution Limit) 16,500 408(p)(2)(E) SIMPLE Maximum Contributions 11,500 414(q)(1)(B) HCE Threshold 110,000 414(v)(2)(B)(i) Catch-up Contributions … [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:04 am
See also Doe v Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 74 (1995); R. 2:11-3(e)(2). [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:30 pm
En efecto, privacidad e intimidad no son sinónimos. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 9:31 am
SEWELL V. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
Section 924(e) requires a lengthy sentence for anyone who violates §922(g) after three convictions for violent felonies or serious drug crimes. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
In both Abu-Jamal's and Frank G. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
UT Law Spring 2010 coastal courses: Climate Change Law & PolicyClass Unique #: 28633 Course #: 179M Instructor: Benjamin/Gholz Credits: 1Wednesday 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm Friday 1:30 pm - 4:30 pm Exam type: Early CLASS MEETS JANUARY 20-FEBRUARY 5.What the course is about. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Photo taken during the investigation of a raw milk-associated E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in Washington State, 2005. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Est-ce une arme véritablement fatale ? [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:03 pm
§ 1806(e) and § 1825(f). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
SONIA VALVERDE; from Bexar County;4th district (04-08-00587-CV & 04-08-00857-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-10-09, pet denied Oct 2009) (designation of responsible third party, timelines, limitations, res judicata)09-0663 MICHAEL G. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
