Search for: "English v. English"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 11,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2015, 3:54 am
It is also pertinent to note that there is similarity in the English court’s approach and that of the Delhi High Court in Oil India Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Case citation: Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Although the German public would likely know the meaning of the word “KOOL” as a misspelling of the English word “cool”, they would most likely not be aware of the word “DIN” and its meaning in the English language. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
As English courts may no longer issue anti-suit injunctions – a remedy expressly admitted to prevent that “the plaintiff will be deprived of its contractual rights in a situation in which damages are manifestly an inadequate remedy” (Lord Millett in The Angelic Grace [1995] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 87) – it seems very likely that damage awards will become much more prevalent in English courts. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:25 am
The facts of the case in Pipeline Systems, Inc. and Continental Western Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
You can celebrate by reading about English-only workplace rules. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
Even before we arrived in Prague, we had to confront the fact that in the Czech Republic, the people speak Czech, a Slavic language with very few English (or even German) cognates. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:08 am
" The tweet was written in Spanish, with the rough English translation, "Keep f***ing around and I'm gonna make you swallow your bitch words you f***ing whitey milks***tter (that's a homophobic slur). [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:14 am
Ok, now what does that mean in plain English? [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:36 am
The ancient Greek word 'αστήρ' (transliterated as aster) found itself in the centre of Community trade mark (CTM) opposition proceedings and the General Court's judgment in Case T‑521/13, Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM / Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm
The opinion is not yet available in English. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
[W]hat WPMC are presenting amounts to a package of the [c]oncert [v]ideo with additional material. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 8:27 pm
, with English lyrics God, save the Tsar! [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
The case of The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Anor (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) [2015] EWHC 1772, decided just a mere two days ago, concerned a UK-based ukulele orchestra, The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain (UOGB), who have, since the mid 1980s, garnered some fame due to their unconventional and humorous takes on rock songs through the musical offerings of the ukulele and unusual garb in doing so. [read post]
