Search for: "Fell v. Fell"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 12,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2016, 9:42 am
The case, Maree v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 11:12 pm
In Gildon v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
The Court of Appeal has handed down its judgment in R (Weaver) v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 587 and, by a majority, L&Q have lost. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:46 am
However the court fell short of granting the tenant an injunction to modify the landlord’s working practices, as injunctions have to be policed by the courts and the judge thought this was not practical in this case. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm
MGN’s article 10 rights carried very limited weight, making this an exceptional case which fell outside the rule [58]. (3) Declaration of incompatibility None of the appellants sought a declaration of incompatibility in regard to the 1999 Act (let alone LASPO). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
Additional information is available on the Chambers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
The point has been considered by the courts in a number of jurisdictions, most recently in the Canadian case of Pridgen & Pridgen v University of Calgary ([2012] ABCA 139) which was recently decided by the Court of Appeal in Alberta. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
SEC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:14 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
[A guest post on Fulton v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
Here, Lozman’s home fell woefully short of that description. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
However, the Appellant sought to sidestep this clause by arguing that it fell foul of UCTA 1977 (for reasons not considered here) and they could therefore rely on the Respondent's misrepresentations.The Respondent had counter-argued that UCTA 1977 did not apply as the contract was an international supply contract. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Yesterday, while the rest of the country was locked in the grip of the commercial vortex that is St Valentine’s Day, Mr Justice Arnold was handing down a sonnet of his own in the form of an epic judgment in DataCard Corporation v Eagle Technologies Limited [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat). [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:22 am
In this post, Mathew Purchase QC of Matrix Chambers shares his views on the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Z) v Hackney LBC [2020] UKSC 40. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am
The Bank was not entitled to rely on section 3 of the Regulation because its business of ship finance was analogous to that of an insurance professional and the Bank fell within a class of persons not deemed to be a “weaker party” (issues 2 and 3). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
The article which was published contained information which fell into three categories: (1) the fact that an allegation had been made by an unidentified person to the Met (2) the fact that the allegation was being investigated; and (3) detail about the allegations which had been made. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:29 pm
Moore that he wished he could call his African American coworker the “N” word, and repeating a disgusting “joke”: “Mo, if a Black man and a Mexican man fell off a high-rise building, who do you think would hit the ground first? [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:05 am
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
