Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 5161 - 5180 of 7,499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:30 pm
In Part 2 I began looking at Universal Music Group v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 7:27 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
This trend is illustrated by the spike in filings asserting violations of the California Private Attorneys’ General Act (“PAGA”), which claims, according to current California precedent, are not subject to arbitration based on Iskanian v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:31 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Crossing the Line in Voir Dire The Utah Court of Appeals rendered an opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
(For good measure, even CBS’s hit TV show “The Good Wife,” which is set in Chicago, has repeatedly presented the city and its residents in an immigrant-friendly light.) [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am by Katherine Gallo
  See California Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2023) ¶8:2236 citing Laguna Auto Body v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Reading the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:40 pm by Rick
  In the “red state/blue state” drawing of maps, if all California were like the counties in which I live, California would be red, not blue. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]