Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 5161 - 5180 of 21,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by Nabiha Syed
Omega, the Court considered whether the first-sale doctrine applies to goods both made and sold outside the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:09 pm
  Here is the Report - no wonder I have been so busy: Foodborne illnesses are a major health burden in the United States. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
Issue: (1) Whether a cartel’s delivery of price-fixed goods overseas for incorporation into finished products imported directly to the United States is immune from private suit under U.S. antitrust law; and (2) whether, absent special circumstances, a motions panel may assign itself to decide the merits of a case. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:33 pm
Settlement Agreements and good advice on how to draft confidentiality provisions:In the recent case Amos v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
Earlier: Vinson & Elkins Raises & Bonuses: New York Happy, Texas Sad Vinson & Elkins - New York - United States - Law - Houston [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm by Ilya Somin
Yesterday, twenty GOP-controlled states filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the program for the four Latin American nations (though not Uniting for Ukraine). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:34 am by Marc DeGirolami
  And in this useful summary of the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:38 am by Larry
On the other hand, as the record is made by the United States government and must be filed with the Court, it seems there should be a logical (though not legal) assumption that it reflects the facts as CBP found them. [read post]