Search for: "I v. B" Results 5161 - 5180 of 24,578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by PaulKostro
Div. 1998) (evidence of prior release of gases ruled admissible under N.J.R.E. 404(b) in toxic tort action by nearby plant workers); Burbridge v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
S89(2)(c) of the Act prohibits the publication of a false statement with the intention of influencing the conduct or outcome of an election, and the accompanying Code of Conduct stated, at item 9, that:  (1) No registered party or candidate may-  … (b)  publish false or defamatory allegations in connection with an election in respect of- (i) a party, its candidates, representatives or members; or 
(ii) a candidate or that candidate’s… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
I’m preparing for an argument, so this week’s update will be brief. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am by Robert Liles
”  Moreover, the government noted that “[b]y and large, their patients were legitimate patients. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
  As Wikipedia explains, and as I have noted in prior posts, a Rule 12(b)(6) motion alleges that the plaintiff has failed to adequately plead a given cause of action in his/her/its Complaint. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that the video footage constitutes an education record that is specifically exempted from disclosure by federal statute (see Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [a]), here the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act, respondent should redact any personally identifiable information contained in those records (see 20 USC § 1232g [b] [2]; 34 CFR 99.31 [b] [1]; Easton Area Sch. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
To the extent that the video footage constitutes an education record that is specifically exempted from disclosure by federal statute (see Public Officers Law § 87 [2] [a]), here the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act, respondent should redact any personally identifiable information contained in those records (see 20 USC § 1232g [b] [2]; 34 CFR 99.31 [b] [1]; Easton Area Sch. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 9:55 pm by Dennis Crouch
”    What I think may be the decisive is buried in Greene’s FN4: “At the very least, patents are quasi-private rights, that is, ‘statutory entitlements * * * bestowed by the government on individuals.'”  quoting B & B Hardware v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 10:41 am
Clement, Procedure, Statistics, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Bar, Ted Olson, Theodore B. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:30 am by MBettman
I’ll make this an annual event, because we all love lists. [read post]