Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 5161 - 5180 of 8,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
The Court of Appeals then takes up Sewell’s argument, explaining that[w]e accept as true at this stage of the proceedings all facts alleged in Sewell's complaint. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am by Susan Brenner
The next question is whether the evidence was introduced `[t]o prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 10:29 pm by Edward A. Fallone
   As noted by this Congressional Research Service Report from August 2016: Under the George W. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:28 am
” Nor does it matter that the government’s interest in preventing sex discrimination may be seen by some as more weighty than the government’s interest in preventing boycotts against Israel. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Because the first conclusion cannot be reached as a matter of law on the present record, [district court] dismissal was premature. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:58 pm by Steven Koprince
 Under the proposed rule, “[t]he limitation on subcontracting requirements would continue to apply to all 8(a), HUBZone, SDVO, and WOSB/EDWOSB set aside contract awards regardless of value, including but not limited to contracts with values between $3,000 and $150,000. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
It wasn’t long before lawyers started paying attention. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 6:55 am by jonathanturley
But “[w]hile the plaintiff’s actual response to the retaliatory conduct provides some evidence of the tendency of that conduct to chill First Amendment activity, it is not dispositive. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[W]e need not decide whether Tofte's and Brookfield's conduct itself was protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:57 pm
No sound reason appears for remanding for findings or trial, when the matter is readily resolved on undisputed facts. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
  The Court of Appeals then explained that[w]e skip to the question whether McGinnis's actions violated any clearly established right. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The government’s defense of the law doesn’t need to be perfect, or even coherent. [read post]