Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 21,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 2:37 pm
Under federal law, furthermore, proper loading of cargo is the duty of the carrier but when the shipper assumes the duty of loading, the rule is that the shipper becomes liable for any issues that arise. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:38 am
Cause-in-fact means proving that the defendant’s conduct actually caused the injury, whereas legal cause means showing that the defendant should be held liable for the plaintiff’s damages. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
When a defendant is convicted of forgery, he may be ordered to pay restitution to a bank which cashed the forged check defendant presented. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
The defendants are consumer review sites Angie’s List and HomeAdvisor. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
After a month-long trial, a jury found that the defendants were liable under the FCA, and the district court entered a $347 million judgment of damages and penalties. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
Johnson had filed an excessive-force claim against the officer and the city, but the defendants countered (and the full U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:08 am
“R.C. 2744.02(B)(1)(a) makes plain that it is the driver’s conduct and culpability in operating a vehicle—not the political subdivision’s—that determines whether the political subdivision may be held liable under the statute. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
Accordingly, the court held that the defendant was liable for the interest.No one mentioned the maker or seller of the tax software in question, and I have not made more than a cursory attempt to identify it because my search terms did not generate anything helpful. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
This appeal considers whether a defendant employer is liable for sexual assaults committed by a medical practitioner in the course of medical examinations carried out at the employer’s request either before or during the claimant’s employment. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm
Under normal circumstances, traveling for medical care does not present any concerns, but when the care provided causes the patient harm, an issue can arise as to what state’s laws apply in determining whether the patient’s care providers should be held liable. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 2:49 pm
Thus, if the person subsequently suffers harm because the care provided was inadequate, there may be more than one care provider liable for the person’s harm. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 5:03 am
In regards to any alleged claim for personal injury, plaintiff failed to offer any competent medical expert to establish that she was emotionally, physically or psychologically injured as a result of defendant's conduct…. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:58 pm
The court ruled that an employer could be liable in this scenario under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:22 pm
Here, the defendants introduced deposition testimony of the plaintiff and her husband, pictures of the accident scene, and a forensic engineer’s affidavit. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 2:40 pm
In many medical malpractice cases, whether the defendant is found liable for the plaintiff’s alleged harm hinges on the strength of the expert opinions set forth by each party. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
The liable party’s insurance company may try to make a low-ball offer to avoid going to court. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
The defendant argued that the court properly excluded the plaintiff’s expert’s testimony because he did not specialize in breast cancer. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:16 pm
” Kroger's house blendMagnum Exotics "Kona blend"The retailer defendants challenged the plausibility of the Lanham Act claims and argued that Section 230 precluded claims against them. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 4:24 am
The judge’s order on Friday is the final decision from last summer’s landmark eight-week trial, the first state trial to determine whether pharmaceutical companies could be held liable for the opioid disaster. [read post]
