Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 5161 - 5180 of 45,546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Although the services remain surprisingly autonomous in the administration of military justice, it is critical that the data gathered reflect common standards, definitions and reporting periods across service lines. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Kay Marbiah
A line of 2021 decisions demonstrate a clear inclination by the courts to extend and apply existing legal principles to deal with disputes arising from crypto-related fraud: In a firm endorsement of the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce’s legal statement on cryptoassets and smart contracts, the courts have confirmed that cryptocurrency is capable of constituting property (see for example, Fetch AI Limited & Anor v Persons Unknown & Ors [3]). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
DorfOn Wednesday of last week, SCOTUS heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm
v=o0OIfdlwZHwVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
[v]  The shortened timeframe for creditors to file claims increases the likelihood that the new owners will be able to acquire a clean title to the property. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm by Samuel Bray
Aaron Nielson has a fascinating post at the Notice and Comment blog on Arizona v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
  The bottom line: it is likely that any enterprise that engages in economic activity in and through Russia (the invading state) as well as those states that have supported or are in any way supporting the Russian effort must both conduct quite rigorous human rights due diligence to determine whether at any point in their global production chains their activity contributes directly or indirectly to the Russian invasion efforts (complicity) and then to make a determination… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 5:15 pm by Josh Robbins
Recently, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held in Meehan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:18 pm by Larry
The context for this dispute flows out of the earlier (and un-appealed) CIT decision in Energizer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Objective injury v subjective harm  Once we move into subjective speech harms the law is loath to impose a duty. [read post]
The Court of Appeal decision The court made short work of the constitutional argument, citing a long line of jurisprudence showing that economic or property interests, like the right to sue for workplace injuries, are not protected by s.7 of the Charter. [read post]