Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5161 - 5180 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unsurprisingly, neither of these worked.The court’s treatment of Coral Ridge as a public figure and this dispute as involving a matter of serious public interest structured its Lanham Act analysis. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant requests that the Settlement Agreement should remain sealed until the final resolution of this matter and then returned to counsel…. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 10:01 pm by Tom O'Connor
Don’t Get “Wild” with Wildcards: eDiscovery Throwback ThursdaysToday’s Webcast Will Show You How to Think Like a Millennial When Addressing eDiscovery Needs: eDiscovery Webcasts  [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by News Desk
If they don’t correct the violations, the FDA can take action up to and including shutting down operations. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 3:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As an initial matter, Grundfest challenges Laster’s reliance on sweeping “first principles” to invalidate the federal forum provision. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:35 pm by Haley Claxton
Report Highlights First, the OIG determined that the ASMPP’s structure didn’t properly ensure that unqualified mentors weren’t receiving program benefits. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:56 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
  The No-Action Letter provides that unless or until terminated by the CFPB as described in the letter: “[T]he Bureau will not make supervisory findings or bring a supervisory or enforcement action against any Recipient under (a) its authority to prevent unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices, or (b) section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and section 1024.14 of Regulation X. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:01 am by Daniel Shaviro
A and B both seek  work, only A exceeds, so only A gets the wage subsidy. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am by Margaret Taylor
(iii) An action, including a personnel action described in section 2302(a)(2)(A) of title 5, constituting reprisal or threat of reprisal prohibited under subsection (g)(3)(B) of this section in response to an employee’s reporting an urgent concern in accordance with this paragraph. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:14 am by Eric Goldman
Nonetheless, as a practical matter, it is nearly impossible to see what really changed. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
Courts examine substantial similarity at the pleading level (typically on a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss). [read post]
How can you tell if Employee A is more engaged than Employee B within the same organization? [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 1:05 pm by Giles Peaker
It doesn’t matter if the property owner is the sole director and shareholder. [read post]