Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5161 - 5180 of 21,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Jessica Zhang, Andrew Patterson
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
There’s a great quote from the 5th Circuit’s 1981 decision in Huddleston v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
In The Patissier LLP v Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd [2019] SGIPOS 10, the Applicant (The Patissier LLP) sought to revoke the mark(“Subject Mark”) registered in the name Aalst Chocolate Pte Ltd, on the ground of non-use under S 22(1)(a) and (b) of Singapore’s Trade Marks Act (“TMA”). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:00 pm by Doug Cornelius
United States Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.), and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Ranking Member of the Senate Banking Committee, along with Representatives Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.), and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) unveiled the Stop Wall Street Looting Act last week. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:42 am by Howard Bashman
United States”: At the “Balkinization” blog, Richard Primus has a post that begins, “An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am by Richard Primus
An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Ltd. v Hai Lun Tang, 2019 TMOB 54 https://t.co/V2PWbByXaB 2019-07-14 YouTube 'Blocks' Popular MP3 Stream-Ripping Sites https://t.co/myg5hyvgq4 2019-07-14 A Win for Browsewrap? [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:26 am by Edith Roberts
New York, “the next big fight will be whether states can draw legislative lines based only on the citizen voting age population. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that “in dozens of education cases in his more than 34 years on the court,” Stevens “was a voice for student rights, racial equality, and a high wall of separation between church and state. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The mark scheme stated that such a claim could not be considered inventive because one of the prior art documents (D2) disclosed fuses with glass layers that were inherently configured to soften and flow. [read post]