Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 10,569
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2015, 11:02 am
You see, being PC really isn’t so hard now is it? [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
“The matter is simple. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
It is not a matter of caveat emptor, but emptor informari. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
The First Amendment doesn’t allow that. 1. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Although Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion conceded that there is no intent standard written into the text of the federal statute, the Court nonetheless found one based on the way similar statutes had been construed. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
” Under these principles, “what [Elonis] thinks” does matter. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
The defendant filed post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law and, in the alternative, for a new trial. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
” An employer is surely entitled to have, for example, a no-headwear policy as an ordinary matter. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:32 am
But under criminal law, their feelings, no matter how reasonable, are irrelevant [?]. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:58 pm
Nevertheless, federal Judge Robert E. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:40 am
But how much does it matter? [read post]
30 May 2015, 5:01 am
As Robert Christgau said in his review of Frankie Goes to Hollywood (remember them?) [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am
After 2014, when those requirements would become mandatory as a matter of federal law, the subsidies were to become available nationwide, whether states set up their own exchanges or elected to let the federal government handle that task. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
Isn’t the harm essentially the same whenever evidence is destroyed, regardless of the specific type of evidence? [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
Just as ‘[t]he ‘ultimate decision’ whether to invoke [a] magistrate [judge]’s assistance is made by the district court,’ Peretz, 501 U. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
Just as ‘[t]he ‘ultimate decision’ whether to invoke [a] magistrate [judge]’s assistance is made by the district court,’ Peretz, 501 U. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:19 am
Even in dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas find ways to ensure that the bankruptcy court’s ruling in Wellness could stand as a final judgment and no mere report and recommendation, in Roberts’s case by adopting an expansive view of property of the estate, and in Thomas’s by suggesting the existence of a brand-new fourth “bankruptcy” exception to the traditional trilogy of Article III exceptions of courts… [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
To the university librarian, Robert H. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:27 am
Six Justices (all but Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas) agreed with the discussion summarized above. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:41 am
Notice that the loathsome Timothy Robert Turner's speech was unquestionably false, and wasn't uttered about public figures or matters of public concern. [read post]
