Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 22,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
RUPA made several changes to the default rules of California partnership law. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:00 am
In the first place, it introduces two unprecedented special rules of jurisdiction, the application of which should not be prejudiced, as stated in Recital 147, by ‘general jurisdiction rules such as those of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012’, ie, the Brussels Ia Regulation on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (by the way, the primacy of the GDPR over Brussels… [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 8:32 am
At least one circuit has explicitly adopted the position set out in the Symczyk dissent. [read post]
30 May 2024, 9:00 pm
” Grant notes that Harvard’s own “Rules and Precepts,” which were adopted in 1646, state that: “Every student be plainly instructed, and earnestly pressed to consider well, the maine end of his life and studies is, to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life (John 17:3) and therefore to lay Christ in the bottome, as the only foundation of all sound knowledge and Learning. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:03 am
Therefore, it is not inconceivable that some of the authors concerned are not, in reality, even aware of the envisaged use of their works and, therefore, that they are not able to adopt a position, one way or the other, on it. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
Therefore, it is not inconceivable that some of the authors concerned are not, in reality, even aware of the envisaged use of their works and, therefore, that they are not able to adopt a position, one way or the other, on it. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
” The kinds of evidence that may be affected by a fluctuating “exclusionary rule” may change, of course, as the Court reexamines the Fourth Amendment itself, and adopts differing interpretations of when a search or seizure may violate that Amendment. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
A widely published author and speaker on HIPAA and other employee benefit and human resources related matters, Ms. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:28 am
His rulings were not merely a matter of Georgia law, but rather were based on his interpretation of the U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
There is a “rule of reason” overtone to the opinion, which states, “As a matter of preparation and best practices, however, lawyers should consider proactively developing an incident response plan with specific plans and procedures for responding to a data breach. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:01 pm
Job descriptions play an important role in a number of employment compliance matters. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 5:23 am
” VLOPs are then also required to adopt “reasonable, proportionate and effective mitigation measures,”“tailored to the systemic risks identified. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
Has your state adopted a version of these rules? [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
BIAS-only providers should, therefore, ensure that all MTE-related contracts entered into subsequent to the effective date of the Declaratory Ruling we adopt today are in compliance with section 64.2500. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
In response to the Windsor ruling of DOMA unconstitutional, the IRS initially updated its guidance to reflect the Windsor ruling in Rev. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
In order to provide a firmer foundation of support for a non-originalist approach to state constitutional adjudication in Connecticut, and to explain why the Connecticut courts should not borrow originalist approaches from federal constitutional cases, as some jurists have argued, this paper makes four assertions: 1) As a matter of Connecticut state constitutional history, it makes no sense to assume as a default rule that the Connecticut Constitution should track the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
Turning to the latter, the recently adopted DSM Directive [Katposts here] shows how any review of EU copyright rules would not just need to consider the (formally rich but substantially relatively thin) existing legislative framework, but also – and possibly above all – the CJEU interpretation of existing sets of rules. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
In order to provide a firmer foundation of support for a non-originalist approach to state constitutional adjudication in Connecticut, and to explain why the Connecticut courts should not borrow originalist approaches from federal constitutional cases, as some jurists have argued, this paper makes four assertions: 1) As a matter of Connecticut state constitutional history, it makes no sense to assume as a default rule that the Connecticut Constitution should track the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:52 am
The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that rule in numerous contexts, the rule has been applied for decades in all types of intellectual property cases, and Congress legislated that rule when it explicitly adopted the rationale of one of those Supreme Court copyright cases, Sheldon v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
Such fracture, Ariens submits, has dissolved this once-unified vision and rendered it virtually impossible to achieve meaningful consensus on principles that matter. [read post]
