Search for: "National Bank v. Case"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 5,229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2007, 9:30 pm
An easy way out of this case, as the Sixth Circuit held, would be simply to defer to the agency's "reasonable" interpretation of the National Bank Act. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:27 pm
See Citizens Bank v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Wachovia Bank, N.A., No. 05-1342 (April 17, 2007).This case resolved the issue of whether Michigan's real estate mortgage lending regulations, which would be preempted if applied to national banks themselves, could nonetheless be applied to a mortgage lending subsidiary of a national bank (Wachovia Bank, N.A.). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
Professor Ann Graham, a banking law scholar, focuses on a few of the surprises in today's decision in the Watters v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:13 am
Announcing the ruling in Watters v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
The NYT, FT and WSJ all spilled ink over the Wachovia case, in which the court ruled that state regulators lack authority to regulate national banks or their operating subsidiaries. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
The earliest-argued cases still undecided -- from the November sitting -- are James v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:18 am
Wachovia Bank [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report], where the Court held that the National Bank Act [text] and regulations promulgated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency preempt state laws regulating mortgage lending by national banks and [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 11:01 am
Indianapolis Public Housing Agency , a 19-page opinion, Judge Riley concludes:In conclusion, we caution that it is undeniable that, in this case, both First National and IHA took risks. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:14 am
See Bank of Nova Scotia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
In a pre-Hague Convention case, the Georgia Supreme Court, in Mitchell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Union itself is a fund manager and member of a cooperative of financial institutions, consisting almost entirely of banks (see here, in German) and two of its main shareholders are banks, namely DZ Bank AG and WGZ Bank AG. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 7:42 am
[23] V. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 3:20 pm
Wassom for the lead.]UPDATE: Here i s the full opinion in Lamont Community Church v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
In an issue of national interest, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:00 pm
Also in the National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports here on the Court's recent ruling in Rockwell International Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 9:31 am
Who can stop these multinational corporations from extracting oil in resource rich nations while at the same time inhibiting and stunting growth in the area? [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:39 am
National Bank v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:21 am
Koehler, 76 N.Y.2d 87, 91 (1990) (citing National Treasury Employees Union v. [read post]
