Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 5161 - 5180 of 37,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 8:22 am by Eric
The court distinguishes the Rock River case by saying that case did not involve a 512(c)(3) takedown notice, so the notice never fell within 512(f)'s ambit in the first place and thus 512(f)'s preemption wasn't triggered. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:04 am
Lord Justice Longmore, giving the leading judgment, stated that, in any event, it is sufficient for a defendant to show that he would be deprived of the time-bar defence if service of the claim form was extended; (ii) in respect of the second ground, none of the relevant case law had been to the judge's attention. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:36 am
The 9th affirms that there is a lack of jurisidiction to review the decision by the district court's regarding a discretionary reduction of sentence under 18 USC 3582(c). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:17 pm by Marta Requejo
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany, in case C- 256/09 was lodged on 10 July 2009 (see V. [read post]