Search for: "State v. Davi" Results 5161 - 5180 of 5,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Conservatives view the (liberal) American regulatory state as akin to communism. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 9:30 pm by Christina Reichert
The abortion bill the Texas Senate passed last week, despite state senator Wendy Davis’s filibuster efforts, has garnered extensive attention in the media. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
As a means of invading privacy, a photograph is particularly intrusive” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 3 December 2020 William Davis J handed down judgment in the case of Stokoe Partnership Solicitors v Robinson & Ors [2020] EWHC 3312 (QB). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 3:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In a March 3, 2014 order (here), the Court granted the defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari in Indiana State District Council of Laborers v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:24 am by Theresa Gabaldon
Davis) that “an action on behalf of the United States in its governmental capacity … is subject to no time limitation, in the absence of congressional enactment clearly imposing it. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09541-19 Brown v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07929-19 Dunn v Liverpool Echo,1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuges (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03690-19 Davies v The Jewish Chronicle,1 Accuracy (2018). [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Davis, New York University School of Law, Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, New York University School of Law. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am by Lisa Meller and Sophie Davis
A more recent example is Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd (2018) where the court stated that when considering reasonable steps to mitigate, a party should consider the interests of both contracting parties and not just its own. [read post]