Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 12,939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
" She stated that she had never operated a handheld torch and had not seen one operated in seventeen years. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Here is a link to the Court's opinion in Merchant v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 5:56 am
A first responder’s PTSD still must meet the criteria set forth in the DSM-V and be diagnosed by a doctor of psychology or a medical doctor working in a related field. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
This is C5's first sortie into this field and the Kat wishes it well. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Attorney Jay V. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:02 am
§ 101 as directed to patent-ineligible subject matter, the PTAB analyzed the claim utilizing the Mayo framework set forth in Alice v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:30 am
This writer commends the government for its bold initiative, following its Australian cousins across the way.The Regulations were challenged in the High Court by all of the major tobacco companies (British American Tobacco (UK) Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary Of State For Health), where the companies, as summarized by Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:54 am
In the state of Illinois, driving under the influence (DUI) is a serious offense. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Baltimore Sports & Social Club, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
The Second Circuit says she does not.The case is Isett v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:02 am
§ 101 as directed to patent-ineligible subject matter, the PTAB analyzed the claim utilizing the Mayo framework set forth in Alice v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The first is what we call “the Steel Seizure principle,” after Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
There's been plenty of exciting material in the field of IP this week -- indeed, a good deal more than a Kat can wave a paw at. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
Cooper v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Supreme Court: McCutcheon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm
In true anecdotal style, the author explains the relevance of Section 115 of the Indian statute (appointment of scientific advisors) by pointing out the open expression of gratitude by Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
On Afro-IP, Caroline NCube's series on African states' IP policy takes her alphabetically from Cameroon to Comoros. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm
For example, some of the field work highlighted that risk averse behaviours around some exceptions had been overcome, such as relating to orphan works. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:07 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in Bowman v. [read post]
