Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 5161 - 5180 of 9,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm by MOTP
Concluding that the movants for arbitration had not substantially invoked the judicial process, the Court did not even reach the second prong of the Perry Homes v Cull test: prejudice to the party opposing arbitration. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature brought a lawsuit and appealed the lower court ruling to the Court, arguing that the so-called Elections Clause, Article I, section 4 of the federal Constitution, which gives power to undertake districting in the first instance to the “legislature” of each state, prevents the people of a state from divesting the elected state legislature of district-drawing power. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 4:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Paul has suggested that, in ex parte circumstances, the court should appoint counsel to protect the interests of the First Amendment and the speaker. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
District Court for the Northern District of Californiaissued at the end of February:  Morici v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:48 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
But it took nearly a century and a half of United States history for the first female federal judges to break the judicial glass ceiling. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:51 pm by Robert Kreisman
In 1997, Thomas, by that time an adult, opened a probate estate in the Illinois state court seeking judicial administration of his father’s estate. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
Many are issues of first impression – meaning the federal courts have not considered them previously. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:01 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The US District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division issued an opinion in a case, illustrative of this tactic. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)), and pre-Bauman –  thus constitutionally suspect – Delaware state decisions, the district court concluded that personal jurisdiction could lie on the basis of “consent. [read post]