Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 5161 - 5180 of 5,196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS). Sorted by Category: Bill No.  A1485 Gunther (MS) -- Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for lifeSUMM : Amd SS168-h & 168-o, Cor L Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for life. 01/09/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA1531 Benjamin -- Provides guidelines for evaluating applications for barbers and cosmetology license where applicant has prior criminal… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
"Since the mark is the same, are the goods substantially different? [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Fun with fundamentals, US-styleRight: the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeThe IPKat, still behind with his Christmas reading, has at last had the chance to examine Fundamentals of United States Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patent, Trademark, the second edition of which was published by Kluwer Law International towards the close of 2006. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
Van Winkle & Co., 402 F.3d 1129, 1132 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. 2,164 Watches, More or Less, Bearing a Registered Trademark of Guess? [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Somehow, you like the ideas but not in any hardcore fundamentalist way, and you see a way to use them and benefit from them but still maintain your bearings and preserve or pursue what you, with good sense, understand to be good. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 2:01 am by Editor
As mitigating factors, the Chamber considered that Seromba had a good reputation prior to the events of 1994; he was relatively young at the time of the events; and his voluntary surrender to the Tribunal. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTTo be televised by ESPNGrand Valley State Lakers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
In this subsection, "professional" means an individual who is licensed or certified by the state or who is an employee of a facility licensed, certified, or operated by the state and who, in the normal course of official duties or duties for which a license or certification is required, has direct contact with children. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:10 am
Note: Article 3a of Directive 84/450 states: "1. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
(b) In the event of a negative response to that question and if other conditions are required in order for a competitive relationship to be established, is it necessary to consider the current state of the market and drinking habits in the Community or is it necessary also to consider how those habits might evolve? [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:11 pm
In just about every iteration of this analysis, one of the factors a court will consider is the channels of trade in which the goods or services bearing the plaintiff and defendant's marks are distributed. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
If Stahl is good law, then the state has a simple way of virtually nullifying the Confrontation Clause in any case of a crime against the person: Bring the accuser to a hospital unit and have her make a statement to someone designated as a care-giver. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 4:20 am
Council Directive 89/104 ... is to be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark can prohibit the transit through a Member State in which that mark is protected (the Federal Republic of Germany in the present case) of goods bearing the trade mark and placed under the external transit procedure, whose destination is another Member State where the mark is not so protected (Ireland in the present case), only if those goods are subject to the… [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 6:57 am
The moral virtues are states of character concerned with choice; examples include courage, temperance and justice. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 10:03 am
In both situations the facts uncovered by the study are usually relevant but not necessarily dispositive.So far, so - well, "good" is too strong a word. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 1:30 am
".The second excitement, if you can bear to wait, comes next Thursday, 9 November, when the ECJ rules in Case C-281/05 Montex Holdings Ltd v Diesel SpA. [read post]