Search for: "State v. Governor" Results 5161 - 5180 of 7,058
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 1:00 pm by Steve Hall
The North Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Conner, et al v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:06 am by Gene Takagi
v=dzcRSr… via @robreich For more interesting tweets, follow me and Emily on Twitter. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:07 pm by Ilya Somin
The talk is sponsored by the University of Mississippi Federalist Society, and will begun at 12:30 PM in Room 2094.Mississippi is one of only a handful of states that have not enacted any eminent domain reforms at all since the Supreme Court’s controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:28 am by scanner1
STATE OF MONTANA, Acting by and through Brian Schweitzer, in his official capacity as chief executive, Governor of the State of Montana, and DAN BUCKS, in his official capacity as Department of Revenue Director, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
However, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed the two-bill approach in order to fill a $1.7 billion hole in the budget and an anticipated ongoing budget deficit problem. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
However, the Legislature enacted and the Governor signed the two-bill approach in order to fill a $1.7 billion hole in the budget and an anticipated ongoing budget deficit problem. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am by Ken Chan
If signed by Governor Brown, the bill would add a section to California Education Code Section 66205 allowing the University of California (UC) and the California State University (CSU) to consider certain factors in admissions, “so long as no preference is given. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am by Ken Chan
If signed by Governor Brown, the bill would add a section to California Education Code Section 66205 allowing the University of California (UC) and the California State University (CSU) to consider certain factors in admissions, “so long as no preference is given.” [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am by David Dirr
  Not surprisingly, many states as well as the National Governors Association filed briefs in support of California. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Lyle Denniston
   The Court has consolidated three cases on that issue, for one hour of oral argument; the lead case is Douglas, et al., v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:13 am by Steven M. Gursten
As an auto insurance lawyer, I saw the insurance industry make these promises in 1995, when then Governor Engler passed radical tort “reform,” and again in 2004 with Kreiner v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am by Rick Hasen
In addition, the grand jury called on the Governor and the State Legislature to “promptly study the problems of election fraud identified in this report…and evaluate various proposals and strike a balance between solving the problem of election fraud and continuing the recent gains in facilitating unimpeded access to the ballot box” (p. 21). [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:32 am by Steven Boutwell
This was the issue presented to the Louisiana Supreme Court in the case, Sullivan v. [read post]