Search for: "State v. Long." Results 5161 - 5180 of 51,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm by Daniel Jin
  [1] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25. [2] Companies Act 2006, section 172. [3] Companies Act 2006, section 172(3). [4] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112. [5] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25 [7] (Reed LJ). [6] Companies Act 2006, Part 23. [7] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [8] https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0046.html [9] (n 4). [10] BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2022] UKSC 25… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
Once the government makes an intervention decision, it may no long issue Civil Investigative Demands in a qui tam.[10] If the government decides to intervene in a case, it must rely on traditional discovery tools to build and prove its case. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” For example, in Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., Inc. (164 AD2d 737 [1st Dept 1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991]), the Court ruled that an out-of-state judgment by confession is entitled to accelerated treatment under CPLR 3213. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
As McPherson was the sole recipient of the messages and they did not cause any long-lasting adverse effects to the claimant, the Judge decided that the serious harm threshold was not met. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:07 am by Jonathan Pyzer
In Jones v Tsige, the Ontario Court of Appeal recognized the tort of “intrusion upon seclusion”. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm by Eric W. Orts
The first instance of the Court’s misfiring came in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Farah Pandith, Jacob Ware
“For a long time it wasn’t violent but for some reason it’s become more scary to live here. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
So writes The Onion in an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to take up Novak v. [read post]