Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 13,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
Supreme Court makes it clear that absent "exceptional circumstances," the Thirteenth Amendment bars compulsory labor “enforced by the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion," citing United States v Kozminski 487 US 931 and a number of other cases. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On the ninth day of jury selection in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:05 am
But in spite of the 11th Circuit's recent decision, the dozens of state legislative proposals mandating drug tests of individuals who apply for and receive various forms of public assistance do not appear to be losing ground. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:17 am
In McDaniel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 12:24 pm
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:34 am
I am losing faith in the system. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:52 am
That case is Wilson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 10:54 am
Patane v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
But this ruling represents a disturbing milestone: For the first time since 1973’s landmark Roe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:13 pm
” The argument then turned to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which prevents parties who lose in state courts from challenging injuries caused by state-court judgments. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:19 am
It wasn’t all pretty though, as tribal leadership disputes spill out in federal and state forums. v. # 13 Big Lagoon Rancheria One of the few tribes to make the list by not really winning anything in 2014; in fact, losing a biggie in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
Balkin continues: On the other hand, if Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 10:15 pm
Fifth Circuit Rule 41.3 discusses what happens if the en banc court loses a quorum: 41.3 Effect of Granting Rehearing En Banc. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:54 am
[Morales v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
But that'd both be boring as well as not particularly helpful to anyone.By contrast, whenever you take sides, the losing party -- as well as anyone who agrees with them -- may well take offense. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In the recent Court of Appeal decision in Kosteckyj v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:19 am
And now, following the Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
” The Court also granted review in OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
