Search for: "State v. Main" Results 5161 - 5180 of 11,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 5:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In finding the measures to be proportionate, the Court distinguished the case of Tabernacle v Secretary of State for Defence in which the Court quashed a byelaw preventing camping next to the Aldermaston nuclear site. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
The first decisions by the Central Division Munich, the Local Division Paris and the Local Division Düsseldorf adjudging a patent’s validity in main proceedings are now out. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
 The defendants filed their second notice of removal, and the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the case to the District of Maine for inclusion in MDL No 268. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 1:10 pm by Victoria Hordern
Not one to hog the limelight, the DPA has typically been cited in past litigation as a secondary or even tertiary issue to the main action when there is a claim for breach of confidence or breach of privacy. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
For instance, the amount of space a person is free to roam in, the degree of supervision and the amount of time away from their main residence are matters which are likely to vary greatly from case to case. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
State oversight and greater transparency and accountability since creation of the Fair Defense Act and the Indigent Defense Commission.2/3: Two major lawsuits: Rothgery v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
  The Ninth Circuit swung mightily and missed with McClellan v. [read post]
[xi] The flow of water is therefore a helpful tool, but not the main factor in this determination. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Law enforcement, he said, "is on a teleogical path toward a surveillance state" and the Fourth Amendment is the main bulwark pushing back against that trajectory. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:56 pm by Stephen Gilles
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 4:09 am by Giles Peaker
” Ms M’s main argument was that the Notice did not include the words “rent means rent lawfully due from the tenant”. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:27 pm
They stated that in Grokster the undisputed evidence showed that close of 90-97% of files were infringing. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:29 pm
However, they stated (at [93]) that section 111 offered no solace to Optus. [read post]