Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 5161 - 5180 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2007, 5:50 pm
The Court has given us some guidance on how to read a deeply fragmented opinion in the 1977 case of Marks v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:15 am by David Oscar Markus
Rush, 240 F.3d 729, 730–31 (8th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (quotation marks omitted); United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
  This marked the second time in recent weeks for the Court to turn aside such a challenge; the first came on Nov. 3, in Berg v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:16 pm by Jag
If the police have not overstepped the mark by targeting individuals they believe to be entirely innocent, then where exactly is that mark? [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports that “the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The TDRA states: “In an action brought under this subsection, the owner of a famous mark shall be entitled to injunctive relief as set forth in section 1116 of this title. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am by Dave
Lester v Woodgate [2010] EWCA Civ 199 is a wonderful example of a neighbour dispute getting out of hand (so out of hand, in fact, that indemnity costs were awarded against the Claimant, in the Truro County Court, in "an exemplary use of the power to mark the court's disapproval of the use of litigation to intimidate", Sedley LJ at [53]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am by Dave
Lester v Woodgate [2010] EWCA Civ 199 is a wonderful example of a neighbour dispute getting out of hand (so out of hand, in fact, that indemnity costs were awarded against the Claimant, in the Truro County Court, in "an exemplary use of the power to mark the court's disapproval of the use of litigation to intimidate", Sedley LJ at [53]). [read post]