Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 5161 - 5180
of 29,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2018, 4:53 am
Wade (or, to be more pedantic, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
Following investigations of measures meant to prevent the risk of river pollution posed by surface water runoff from the site, a screening opinion was issued stating that an EIA was not required in this circumstance and planning officers reiterated this in a detailed report presented to the respondent council committee. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:58 pm
Ryals v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 8:43 am
The court also granted certiorari in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:50 pm
As a result of the inquiry, the Secretary of State (SoS) decided to grant planning permission to SITA for the construction of two energy-from-waste plants. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:15 pm
., v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
" Faber [v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 10:16 am
■ First up, a tale of wasteful spending courtesy of co-blogger Bob V. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:59 am
It requires the school districts to devise an individualized education plan for the disabled student, and if the parents and school district disagree about the plan, they can litigate this dispute at an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
[Germany ] [Habitual Residence] In Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 7:11 am
Even when parents in a Missouri divorce are able to agree on a custody plan, a family court judge must confirm that it is in “the best interests of the child” and meets all other requirements of state law. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:26 am
It is called a “Belo Plan,” named after the Supreme Court case that allowed the exception, (Walling v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
On June 12, 2014 the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Clark v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:03 pm
Washington (shellfish implementation plan)Salton Sea Venture, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:58 am
Realty LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:58 am
Realty LLC v. [read post]
