Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 5161 - 5180 of 8,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 8:59 pm by Amy Howe
  Clement emphasized that the federal government did not need to enact laws regulating individual conduct to put the treaty into effect in the United States because state laws could do so. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Olivier Theard
On October 15, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review six of the nine submitted petitions stemming from an appellate court ruling upholding Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) greenhouse gas (“GHG”) controls at utilities, factories and other facilities around the country. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 pm by Jane Chong
They demolished the great principles that your forefathers, the founding fathers, built the United States of America on. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:00 am by Faiza Patel
Rather, destruction facilities are generally built right next to storage sites to avoid the risks of moving them and because national law often (for example in the United States) forbids transport. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
    In West v Dobrev, 2013 WL 5813749 (10th Cir, 2013) Petitioner West, a lawyer, was a citizen of Romania and the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 ”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 3:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Petitioner, a citizen of the United States, applied for such a license, the Commissioner denied her application, and she brings this proceeding to compel him to grant it. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Stephen Bilkis
A Manhattan Child Custody Lawyer said in 1996, the United States Congress required each state to enact the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, to ensure uniformity in interstate actions for the establishment, enforcement, and modification of spousal and child support orders, New York adopted UIFSA in 1997, designating Family Court as our UIFSA tribunal. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
United States Steel Corporation, to be argued on Monday. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:32 pm by JP Sarmiento
We demonstrated the intrinsic merit of our client’s research in the United States, the national scope of his research, and asserted that our client would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would an available U.S. worker having the same minimum qualifications. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Geoffrey Rapp
In support of Lawson and Zang, the United States will argue that the statute’s overall scheme and purpose favors the Department of Labor’s interpretation. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by JP Sarmiento
CASE: I-130 and Consular Processing (Immigrant Visa) CLIENT: Chinese LPR Petitioner in Ohio; Chinese Beneficiary Wife in China LOCATION: Petitioner: Ohio; Beneficiaries: China Our client retained us to bring his wife from China to the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm by Ken White
United States, 403 U.S. 713, 91 S.Ct. 2140, 29 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971), or competing constitutional interests, Nebraska Press Assn., 427 U.S., at 559, 96 S.Ct., at 2802, are concerned, we have imposed this “most extraordinary remed[y]” only where the evil that would result from the reportage is both great and certain and cannot be mitigated by less intrusive measures. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:02 am by Stephen Bilkis
Petitioner’s 59% share of child care expenses is $80, and respondent’s 41% share of such expenses, amounting to $55, shall be paid to petitioner through the Essex County Child Support Collection Unit commencing March 7, 2008. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
Question #7- Employment Based Green Card How long do I have to live and work in the United States before I can apply for my Green Card? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:52 am by Jon Gelman
(Response due June 13, 2013)May 30 2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 15, 2013.Jun 10 2013Brief amicus curiae of DRI -The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.Jun 13 2013Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al filed.Jun 13 2013Brief amicus curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. filed.Jul 15 2013Brief of respondents Richard Stengel, and Mary Lou Stengel in opposition filed.Jul 30 2013Reply of petitioner Medtronic, Inc. filed.Jul… [read post]