Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 5161 - 5180 of 14,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 6:28 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
To do so otherwise would be to subject these individual legal entities to binding legal outcomes without first being afforded due process which is a protected right under the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Justice Scalia’s opinion states: “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-9604 Issue: Whether Missouri’s second-degree burglary statute is divisible into two offenses with separate elements for the purpose of analyzing whether a conviction under that statute qualifies as a conviction for a “violent felony” as defined in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by Scott Harman
It remains possible that the government will transport Doe to the United States for prosecution. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:39 am by Nicole Bürli
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Palais Wilson, Geneva Earlier this year, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (Committee) handed down a case on violence against women in the matter of T.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:53 am by SHG
The First Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am by CFM Admin
 South Korea’s Financial Services Commission made a similar announcement a few weeks later, stating that all ICO fundraising would be banned and that it would establish tighter anti-money laundering prevention policies for virtual currencies. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
 It devotes nearly two pages of close legal analysis to explaining why, in its view, adopting proactive measures would not deprive a platform of hosting protection under Article 14 of the Directive. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
 It devotes nearly two pages of close legal analysis to explaining why, in its view, adopting proactive measures would not deprive a platform of hosting protection under Article 14 of the Directive. [read post]