Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 5161 - 5180 of 22,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2020, 12:13 am by INFORRM
Decisions this Week United StatesIndex Newspapers LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:43 pm by admin
Supreme Court decision, Birchfield v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Mai was born in a Thai refugee camp to a Vietnamese family and moved to the United States at the age of two. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 3:00 pm
  The Fourteenth Amendment just implies (at most) that states can take away the right of felons to vote, not that it should (and certainly not that it must). [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
  One gets hints of this possibility from the Declaration of the Indigenous Peoples Participating in the V Regional Forum On Business And Human Rights For Latin America An The Caribbean which was circulated during the course of the event. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:17 am by Kirk Anderson
We have received many questions from people wanting to know how the United States Supreme Court decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
Below, we have set out examples of how DMCA 1201 -- and its Mexican equivalent -- is incompatible with human rights, including free expression, self-determination, the rights of people with disabilities, cybersecurity, education, and archiving; as well as the law's consequences for Mexico's national resiliency and economic competitiveness and food- and health-security. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:18 am by David Kris
Thanks to these and other efforts, the United States disrupted a concerted effort to undermine the midterm elections. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:00 am by Prerna Tara
Do we actually have the same magnitude of a problem in the United States as it is in India? [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]