Search for: "United States v. Was" Results 5161 - 5180 of 102,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 7:50 am by Max Kohn
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by Benjamin Goh
The UPC is a new patents court which came into force on 1 June 2023, made up of judges who are nationals of EU Member states that are participating in the UPC. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
  United States On 13 June 2023, the Texas Governor signed HB4 to make Texas the tenth state to have a comprehensive privacy law. [read post]
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs announced an executive order on Friday that protects abortion rights within the state one year after the Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm by Aaron Moss
The Transfers In the parties’ agreement (read here), Gallo and Sweet Revenge expressly represented and warranted that Gallo “created and/or wrote the Story as an employee-for-hire” of Sweet Revenge, and that the story “constitutes a work-made-for-hire pursuant to the United States Copyright Laws. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Fla. 2019), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained that what constitutes “outrageous” conduct is a question of law. [read post]