Search for: "*du. S. v. Doe"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 4:01 am
Merrick Pet Care, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Valard Construction Ltd v Bird Construction Company, 2016 ABCA 249 [26] The appellant does not dispute the fact that it had the means to legally compel the respondent to provide information about a bond under s 33 of Alberta’s Builders’ Lien Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
ExtraditionIndia v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:09 am
Pty. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:09 pm
His remarks were reported in the February 2016 edition of the Journal du Barreau. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Le juge du procès a conclu à l’absence de violation de l’al. 11b). [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:26 am
Besides yesterday's Opinion of AG Wathelet, another recent example that comes to mind is the Opinion of AG Szpunar in Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, C-174/15 [the 'e-lending case', currently in progress and noted here], in which he clearly stated [para 34] that "the principal objective of copyright is to safeguard the interests of authors".Secondly, should the CJEU follow the Opinion of AG… [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 7:05 pm
…the LSUC’s decision not to accredit TWU does not prevent the practice of a religious belief itself; rather it denies a public benefit because of the impact of that religious belief on others – members of the LGBTQ community. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
Du Bois, The Souls of Black Folk (1903); J. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:53 am
Drake Revocable Trust v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:00 am
It does this by removing criminal and civil liability from those who provide such assistance provided that the procedure set out in the Bill is followed. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm
Maraist Professor of Law and Wex S. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
The fact that a word is complimentary or laudatory term does not necessarily mean it is devoid of distinctive character as long as it is capable of indicating commercial origin. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
We found it strange that last month’s decision in Jenkins v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 12:00 am
Mylan argued that Danielson does not apply, citing to Merck & Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
(This site does some of that work, confirming boycotts by entities as diverse as TIAA, Cirque du Soleil, and Pearl Jam.) [read post]
