Search for: "A. T. vs STATE OF FLORIDA" Results 501 - 520 of 653
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm by Chris Martin
  Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al vs Frank's Casing, 246 S.W. 42 (Tex. 2008). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:26 am by Attorney David Centeno
Baker where a state judge in Suffolk County ordered a mother to make her two children available for Skype online video conferencing with their father as a condition of her move to Florida. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform  Act – Senate patent reform debate (Maier & Maier) (IPBiz) (Inventive Step) (Maryland IP Law Blog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patents Post Grant Blog) Patent reform – first-to-invent vs first-to-file debate (Patentology) (Inventive Step) (IPBiz) (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Inventive Step) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) Patent Reform: Good for Innovation. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:16 am by Juan Antunez
”  The 4th DCA didn't bite on the in rem reference, instead framing its analysis on the required two-part personal jurisdiction test I've written about before [click here]. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:27 am by South Florida Lawyers
Did you watch a bunch of show business kids making movies of themselves, you know they don't give a....Oh well, you know the rest. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am by Law Lady
Co., 21 No. 17 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 6, Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage February 4, 2011A New Jersey insurance company need not defend a policyholder in a lawsuit in which her ex-boyfriend alleges she intentionally failed to disclose her herpes infection to him, a state appellate court has ruled. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Steve Lombardi
Girl wrestling isn’t real wrestling; if you think I’m wrong then watch every video in this post and by the end if you think I’m wrong write it publicly and call me out; if not then stop talking about coed wrestling: Iowa, Florida, World, Ohio, Texas, California, Washington, New Jersey vs Virginia, Oregon vs New York and in Moscow. 1972 - This is where Iowa Wrestling started and what it’s all about. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:57 am by Bill Raftery
Additionally, there is the dearth in legislative pay (especially vs. what the lawyer could be making in his or her practice in the time spent in legislative service) and the increasing time pressure put on legislators even in states with nominally “part-time” legislatures. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:26 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
If he can get them enacted, and Florida rebounds (or at least doesn't need new bailouts), that will provide one sort of template for the other insolvent States. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:27 am by Andrew Wilcox
A lot of firms simply are not set up to handle how lobbyists bill and develop clients vs. how attorneys do. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Over two years ago I posted about a decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in a father vs. son corporate dissolution case called Matter of Wenger. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm by Bexis
  If anything, those claims were closer to the claim of “duty to contraindicate” an FDA approved drug use that the Levine Court specifically stated it wasn’t deciding (presumably because it couldn’t muster an anti-preemption majority). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am by ERIC J DIRGA PA
This court finds that Hernandez vs. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
 Thus, if we can't use the Scallan estimates for comparison, is there any way to say whether food in the United States is safer now than it was 11 years ago? [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Voters in California and Florida overwhelmingly passed redistricting reforms in recent elections, and there's no reason why, working with Ed Koch and our state legislative leaders, we can't do the same here. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]