Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 8:44 pm
Texas v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:55 am
A similar view was reached by the Divisional Court in R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] 1 WLR 2009 and by Blake J in R (G) v Chief Constable of Surrey Police [2016] 4 WLR 94. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 10:53 am
Complicating any effort to simply get rid of climate change regulation of the power sector was the Supreme Court prior ruling in Massachusetts. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 5:39 am
The lawsuit was filed in State Court and ACE had the case removed to Federal Court where ACE claimed the case against Kirn was sued for the purposes of defeating diversity jurisdiction and was thus, an improper joinder. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
The test in Bonnard is a much higher threshold than in claims for interim injunctions in privacy claims, where the applicant only need establish that his claim is more likely than not to succeed at trial (Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee ([2005] AC 253). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Reference was also made to the retirement-age swimming pool case, James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The judgment of Calveley v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [1989] 1 AC 1228 was found to be instructive in this regard, where it was held that a Chief Constable did not, in principle, owe a duty of care to protect the economic and reputational interests of his officers in respect of the prosecution of an investigation or disciplinary proceedings brought against them. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” At ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia argues that “Kavanaugh’s 2014 dissenting opinion in SeaWorld of Florida, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Skelly properly followed the ACE-V method. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Skelly properly followed the ACE-V method. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:22 am
”...AND: The dissenting opinion by Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justice Ginsburg) brings up Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:53 am
On the Mareva injunction, the Singapore High Court adopted the majority approach in the Privy Council decision of Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] 1 AC 284. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
"From the Supreme Court's opinion today in Gill v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
See Kessel v. [read post]
