Search for: "ACTAVIS" Results 501 - 520 of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
On the same day as FDA's decision, FDA approved a generic Ambien CR® 6.25 mg tablet (tentative approval for 12 mg tablet) filed by Actavis and tentative approvals for generic Ambien CR® 6.25 mg and 12 mg tablets filed by Synthon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:48 am by Editors
Actavis Mid Atlantic, concerning the breadth of an advance waiver between a sophisticated client and law firm, should be reviewed very carefully by in-house and outside counsel. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Gene Quinn
For more on the Actavis case, please see Supremes Say Reverse Payments May Be Antitrust Violation. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:26 am by James Yang
Actavis, the Federal Trade Commission sued all parties (Solvay (patentee) and Actavis (generic drug manufacturer) to a Pay for Delay settlement agreement for violating antitrust laws. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
 Mylan and Actavis were seeking revocation of the patent. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
 Interestingly, MSD amended its patent to include a new claim 17 upon which it relied to protect the product for the purposes of obtaining the SPC, but didn't rely upon it at trial (c.f with the position in Actavis v Boehringer [2013] EWHC 2927 at [10]). [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:26 pm
” Andrea Rossi reflects on when Pringles, drunk cart drivers, wine, art, and trade mark law come into contact.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes takes a look at the recent application of the Actavis case in the High Court case Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC 63, where the Actavis questions were applied to a numerical value for the first time.InternKat Jonathan Pratt also looks at the application of Actavis in "Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Following Actavis vs Eli Lilly, is the UK becoming more author-centric? [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
| Oprah Winfrey and OWN YOUR POWER trade mark | EPO December Administrative Council Meeting | Blurred Lines | Again on Actavis v Boehringer | Is the EU Patent Package diminishing the EU’s powers? [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
. * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 3: a "lyrical" solution to a painful patent disputeAfter the Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others, which Darren reported here, Jeremy has got some news to break on that painful patent war.* Blind faith not enough when proving bad faith: a case of ColourblindnessValentina reports on a fresh trade mark dispute that the General Court has just decided, Pangyrus Ltd v… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
| Oprah Winfrey and OWN YOUR POWER trade mark | EPO December Administrative Council Meeting | Blurred Lines | Again on Actavis v Boehringer | Is the EU Patent Package diminishing the EU’s powers? [read post]