Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Over the past year, the Obama Administration also has amended its FMLA regulations to make clear that the Obama Administration expects private sector employers covered by the FMLA to offer family leave to same-sex domestic partners on the same terms as for heterosexual married couples in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Windsor decision. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:09 am
Below, relying on the High Court’s 1977 ruling in Abood v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
The Appeals Court said, ". . .we disagree that the Eleventh Amendment bars the assertion of federal court jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims, and we remand for resolution of the case's status and the possible need to resolve a litany of other issues concerning the viability of the complaint. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
First, the court found that the constitutional amendments gave citizens protections from government or state action, not the individual Association manager. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
The Montana Supreme Court rejected petitioners’ claim that this statute violates the First Amendment. 2011 MT 328, 363 Mont. 220, 271 P. 3d 1. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:47 am
As amended, the new rule would apply to private funds making general solicitations under Rule 506(c). [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:41 pm
The second Release propses amendments as to for-profit entities with religious objections, responding to the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby decision. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:03 pm
” The governor may make, amend and rescind orders and regulations necessary to carry out the provisions of the California Emergency Services Act under § 8567; widespread publicity and notice is required of any such orders, regulations, amendments or recissions. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
Tatro properly investigated leveraged inverse funds. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm
A pension plan maintained by a church-affiliated hospital qualifies as a church plan even if not established by a church, and, therefore, is exempt from ERISA regulation, the Supreme Court has ruled, reversing decisions by the Courts of Appeals for the Third, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:22 am
The Arbitration Rule threatens to divert funds from patient care. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
In recent testimony before the House Committee, Richard Baker, head of the Managed Funds Association, testified that an SRO would, among other things, lack the expertise to conduct an effective examination over hedge fund managers. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm
Along with John Fund, he is the co-author of “Who’s Counting? [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am
New Third-Party Release Tracker (Post-Purdue Pharma) - identifies cases in which the requested third-party releases implicate the Supreme Court’s ruling in Purdue Pharma. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:37 am
The rule is currently on hold pursuant to a nationwide stay the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued in October while it determines which courts have jurisdiction to hear the various court challenges. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 12:03 pm
The district court granted the motion and dismissed the class action without leave to amend, id. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Last month, the Supreme Court of Delaware held that Federal forum provisions, which require actions arising under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to be filed in a Federal court, could survive a facial challenge. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:19 am
Similarly, it is not known how the publisher can ensure the transparency of the “sources of the funds being used”. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm
In 2019, as the owners’ relationship deteriorated due to disagreements over the company’s management, Soniat exercised his majority voting power (gained from the dilution of Leary’s interest) as a member and on the board of managers by amending Coinmint’s operating agreement, removing Leary from the board, and designating Soniat’s holding company as sole manager. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
Specifically, the question before the Court is: “Whether a state violates the Equal Protection Clause by amending its constitution to prohibit race and sex-based discrimination or preferential treatment in public-university admissions decisions. [read post]
