Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2010, 4:40 am
With one qualification that we will discuss below, the Supreme Court now appears to have clarified that this is the case, in Dozco India v Doosan, decided on 5 October, 2010. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:48 am
Of moment, the Supreme Court rejected the reasoning of a 2003 decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, ACS Construction Company v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
The importance of the role of the media to the principle of open justice is nothing new: see, eg Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Rix LJ also referred to the distinction drawn by Baroness Hale in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34, [2007] 1 AC 224 between “the ordinary banter and badinage of life and genuinely offensive and unacceptable behaviour”. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
Even if the ACS personnel here involved had been aware of Dr. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
The first strand Mr Sterling emphasised the importance of the headline, in particular Lord Nicholls’ observation that “Those who print defamatory headlines are playing with fire” (Charleston v News Group Newspapers Limited [1995] 2 AC 65, 74). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:13 am
Classification of a covenant, therefore, can be outcome-determinative in a state like Georgia.The Court of Appeals agreed with ACS, finding that although the covenant was contained in an employment agreement, it was a condition precedent to the stock purchase agreement between Boyce and the majority shareholder. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
The ACS was the FBI’s Automated Case Support System; as this press release explains, in 2013 the FBI replaced the “paper-based” ACS System with a new digital system. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:23 am
In the case of Ace v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
This author was delighted to stumble upon the latest decision in the intriguing litigation between Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier when browsing through the recent list of Chancery decisions ([2016] EWHC 366 (Ch)). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
When Ed Blum brought Evenwel v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:28 pm
Servs., Inc., 29 S.W.3d 74, 77 (Tex. 2000) (citing ACS Invs, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
Wealands [2007] 2 AC 1). [read post]
