Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 8:22 am
”...AND: The dissenting opinion by Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justice Ginsburg) brings up Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:53 am
On the Mareva injunction, the Singapore High Court adopted the majority approach in the Privy Council decision of Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] 1 AC 284. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
"From the Supreme Court's opinion today in Gill v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
See Kessel v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
See Kessel v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
As Viscount Simon LC observed in Nokes v Doncaster Amalgamated Collieries Ltd [1940] AC 1014, 1022, Parliament would legislate only for the purpose of bringing about an effective result. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm
United States. [read post]
15 May 2018, 6:35 am
The case is styled, Padilla v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:25 pm
The Court referred to the basic principle in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460 that "a stay will only be granted on the ground of forum non conveniens when the court is satisfied that there is some other available forum, having competent jurisdiction, which is the appropriate forum for the trial of the action i.e. in which the case may be tried more suitably for the interests of all the parties and the ends of justice. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
(ii) Summary judgment against Illumina on the basis of issue estoppel The defendants’ application to enter summary judgment in respect of the new claim was brought on the basis of issue estoppel; namely, that it had already been decided that Illumina did not have standing to sue as it was not an exclusive licensee under the patents being enforced and that it should not be entitled to reopen this question.Carr J explained the law on issue estoppel by reference to Keith LJ’s judgment… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
Guest post by Colleen V. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
Considering Shevill v Presse Alliance SA (Case C-68/93) [1995] 2 AC 18, the ECJ had emphasised that the object of article 5(3) was to allocate jurisdiction by reference to the place where an event considered harmful occurred. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
At the ACS Blog, Ruben Garcia looks at the court’s decision in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
AC iii! [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
Therefore, what the member states earn in official fees, they will typically lose in corporate or income taxes. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
In a majority opinion in Evenwel v. [read post]
