Search for: "Adam Anthony" Results 501 - 520 of 967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2011, 7:36 pm by Jeff Foust
Adam Schiff (D-CA) tried to find a middle ground, saying he supported COPS but that the funding should not be taken from NASA. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
To top it all off, there will be continuing speculation as to whether Justice Anthony M. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v Adams (Northern Ireland), heard 19 November 2019. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the Supreme Court litigation record of top-tier law firms. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v Adams (Northern Ireland), heard 19 November 2019. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[t]he court’s action means that the corporation must provide information to the special counsel or pay mounting financial penalties. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Duval v 11-13 Randolph… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:43 pm by Jim Walker
Jay Robert Pritzker, Anthony Pritzker and Penny Pritzker, with $1.4 billion a piece, are next at No. 721, followed by a half dozen more Pritzkers who tie at No. 773. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines “the justices’ voting pairs and how they might shift if Justice [Anthony] Kennedy does retire at the end of the term. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
In his Sidebar column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses the Court and its ban on free speech on the marble plaza in front of the Court building. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:15 am by Joe Consumer
Anthony Sebok, a torts professor at Benjamin N. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:31 am
Jagels remains adamant that putting more criminals in prison has kept a tight lid on crime in his rural pocket of the Central Valley, and says he'll retire assured that he used his power to keep his constituents safe. ... [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Duval v 11-13 Randolph… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 3:20 am
But Mark Stancil, the lawyer for Edwards, was just as adamant that a defendant declared competent to stand trial should be allowed to handle his or her defense. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
”   Elsewhere at Talking Points Memo, Kapur speculates that the Chief Justice “may have revealed his antipathy to federal marriage equality by attempting to discredit an argument by Justice Anthony Kennedy that [DOMA] violates states rights. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
Divorce and Social Media This fact is something that Anthony D. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 12:05 pm by Caesar and Napoli, P.C.
“I have disappointed Thomas Jefferson and John Adams,” wrote the Florida appeals judge that upheld the decision forcing Leydiana into arbitration. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
PERRY A jury convicted appellant William Anthony Perry of carrying a dirk or dagger concealed on his person (Pen. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm by Walter Olson
And Anthony Sebok, writing at the time of the law’s passage, sharply criticizes the law’s expansion of immunity in home and car scenarios, again not at issue in the Martin case. [read post]