Search for: "Amendments To Rules Regulating the Bar"
Results 501 - 520
of 4,987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
United States (1960), "[t]he Fifth Amendment's guarantee that private property shall not be taken for a public use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
A federal judge in California blocked a Biden Administration rule that bars migrants who crossed into the United States from applying for asylum unless they entered the country at an official port of entry or obtained asylum protection in a different country. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
That evidence consisted of the utter poverty of the claimants, their substantial lack of education of knowledge of the ways of sophisticated legal proceedings, the lack of a robust market in Kenya for funding the claims of the indigent, the difficulty of securing public assistance, the prohibition against contingency fee representation, the difficulties of class action, the lack of capacity of the Kenyan bar or their unwillingness to take on a client that may offend the sensibilities… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[2] When companies fail to make the required disclosures about cyber risks or inform investors of a cyber incident in a timely manner, the Commission can bring an enforcement action based on existing disclosure obligations.[3] We do not need additional regulations. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
A year later, the government took more steps to regulate NGO activities by initiating a new draft law “On Non-Commercial Non-Governmental Organizations,” requiring registration of local NGOs. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am
I also do not believe that the Supreme Court bar is particularly concerned with overly embellished statements about congressional productivity. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
“Several attorneys and organizations took this ruling as a signal that it was a good time to bring new First and/or Fourth Amendment cases against mandatory bars or revive old challenges, in part because of the belief that Janus was relevant to mandatory bars and might overrule the precedent set by the Court’s 1990 decision in Keller v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In 2016, lawmakers amended the state’s campaign finance laws amid a bitter debate over “dark money. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Before announcing her plans, she accordingly brought a preenforcement challenge to CADA, seeking to clarify her First Amendment rights. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
A First Amendment violation? [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
(This is a longstanding rule for maritime commerce.) [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 6:57 am
So, contractors must now take steps to bar TikTok from devices that will be used in federal contract performance by updating procedures and policies. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
When and how does the business judgment rule apply to any board decisions on these matters? [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
"The regulation of a medical procedure that only one sex can undergo does not trigger heightened constitutional scrutiny unless the regulation is a 'mere pretex[t] designed to effect an invidious discrimination against the members of one sex or the other.' [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
FINRA Bars Advisor Helen Caldwell after Allegations of Outside Business Activities The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the regulator who oversees brokers and brokerage firms, has reportedly barred financial advisor Helen Caldwell from the securities industry as of July 6, 2023. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:03 am
That is a fairly high bar for those challenging the public summary process. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm
Wade ruling when it ruled the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
That decision, far from supporting the district court’s peculiar ruling, points in the opposite direction: it supports the government’s authority to regulate speech – and indeed to compel speech – on private platforms in certain circumstances. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
That decision, far from supporting the district court’s peculiar ruling, points in the opposite direction: it supports the government’s authority to regulate speech – and indeed to compel speech – on private platforms in certain circumstances. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:13 am
In May 2022, a divided three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit ruled in Jarksey’s favor, holding that the administrative courts, as currently constituted and structured, violate the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial. [read post]
