Search for: "American President Lines v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Constitution, commits the power to make foreign policy, including the decisions to permit or forbid entry into the United States, to the President and Congress. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:52 pm
Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946)United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
The case, Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
Meanwhile, the United States is intensifying its own campaign against the Islamic State in Syria. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The Appointments Clause of the Constitution requires high-level officers of the United States to be appointed through nomination by the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:19 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court made that clear in Jacobson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The Constitution further requires, in Article II, Clause 8, that presidents take an oath to faithfully execute their office, and to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has recently sent this case back to the lower courts, and the future looks dim for the Little Sisters.The new Court line-up will also affect older cases like Harris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:09 pm
As our organization, United to Protect Democracy, pointed out in this memo, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am
Trump and Stockman v. [read post]
