Search for: "American Sales Corporation v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 722
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
McNamara secured the first race discrimination verdict in the United States against a real estate franchise for failure to award a sales agency to an African-American in Tyler v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:54 am by randal shaheen
Justice Ginsberg wrote for the three dissenters, finding that McIntyre’s interactions with the United States market as a whole were sufficient grounds to find jurisdiction in New Jersey.The dissent believed that the case presented an example of “marketing arrangements for sales in the United States common in today’s commercial world. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm by Charles Kotuby
Related posts:The United States Supreme Court to Take a Fresh Look at Personal Jurisdiction Today, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in two... [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm by Charles Kotuby
It has been nearly a year since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Morrision v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm by Howard Ullman
Girl Scouts of the United States of America, Inc., No. 10-1986 (7th Cir. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Nevertheless, although outcomes were not statistically different for Latin American and non-Latin American respondents, amounts claimed against Latin American states were higher - but only for non-ICSID arbitration. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Nevertheless, although outcomes were not statistically different for Latin American and non-Latin American respondents, amounts claimed against Latin American states were higher - but only for non-ICSID arbitration. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   United States US Patent Reform Campaign against America Invents Act intensifies (Inventive Step) Will you be crushed like a bug? [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am by Kara OBrien
  Tenaris’s Asserted FCPA Violation and Subsequent Investigation According to the Statement of Facts in the Tenaris DPA, in 2006 and 2007, Tenaris’s sales personnel for the Caspian Sea region (which accounted for only 1% of its total global sales and services between 2003 and 2008) allegedly engaged in a bid-rigging scheme involving four contracts with OJSC O’ztashqineftgaz (“OAO”), a subsidiary of Uzbekistan’s state-owned oil and… [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:34 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  Nearly 50% of DaimlerChrysler’s global sales are in the United States, and 2.4% of its total sales are in California. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm by Deeptak Gupta
AT&T then charged them $30.22 in sales tax for the phones. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:50 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
(“Penguin”), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City, sued American Buddha, a not-for-profit corporation with its principal place of business in Arizona, for copyright infringement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:47 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
(“Penguin”), a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New York City, sued American Buddha, a not-for-profit corporation with its principal place of business in Arizona, for copyright infringement in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:13 am by FDABlog HPM
”  In addition, “[e]ach person, partnership or corporation that violates or assists in the violation of [new Sec. 28] shall forfeit and pay to the United States a civil penalty of not more than 3 times the gross revenue of the NDA holder from sales of the drug product that is the subject of the patent infringement claim for the period of the violation, starting with the date of the agreement. [read post]