Search for: "Application of Floyd" Results 501 - 520 of 608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am by NL
Further, in view of the refusal of Floyd J and of the Deputy Judge to adjourn the trial, I do not think that Mrs Pritchard has put forward a good reason for not attending the trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Floyd Abrams, Esquire, addressed applicable First Amendment principles and recommended that any legislation must be narrowly drafted so that it's addressing only those sites that are "all but totally infringing. . . . if the entity is nothing but a transmitter of infringing products, you are permitted to deal with it as long as the remedy is not overbroad. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
”The claim was invalid for obviousness.Turning to claim 22, the use of the claim 1 process in a process of making citalopram, Floyd J explained that a skilled person seeking to make citalopram from 5-cbx under the instructions found in Lundbeck’s own prior art patent application (“513” published May 1998) would need a method for making the 5-cbx. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
Turning then to FDC's application to amend its application, he felt that he could not allow any amendment which raised a new cause of action if it was already within the scope of the German proceedings. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Shouse Law Group
If the property is valued at less than $250, the applicable offense is petit larceny (also called petty larceny). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
5,697,775; 5,897,308; and 6,093,017 claim "lighters having extended lighting rods (useful for lighting barbecue grills, for example)" with "automatic child-safety mechanisms for preventing accidental ignition. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
An I been wonderin' if all our folks got together an' yelled, like them fellas yelled, only a few of 'em at the Hooper ranch ----"     Ma said, "Tom, they'll drive you, an' cut you down like they done to young Floyd. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
There are cases where Singapore do vary including the application of the law of passing off as applied in the House of Lords case of Scandecor. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:16 am by INFORRM
The judge relied on two principal reasons: “Firstly it seems to me that the documents are likely to support the case of the applicant. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:30 am by INFORRM
On 14 December 2010 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Pink Floyd Music Limited v EMI Records ([2010] EWCA Civ 1429) – a contractual dispute concerning downloading of music to iTunes. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:08 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
  Certainly as we need to re-examine the applicable rules and regulations that apply to all elders to ensure their safety is not compromised by corporations seeks to avoid compliance. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
One solution canvassed for a) was to rethink our conception of inherently patentable subject matter; in Mr Peter Prescott QC’s language from CFPH’s Application (HCJ 2005), to think more deeply about how we conceive individual subject matter “under the description ‘invention’”. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
 Speaking will be Mr Justice Floyd, Daniel Alexander QC, and Professor Rochelle Dreyfuss on issues relating to the patentability of products and the scope of protection which patents confer on products. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
Turning then to FDC's application to amend its application, he felt that he could not allow any amendment which raised a new cause of action if it was already within the scope of the German proceedings. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:27 am by Jonathan Bailey
Applicants must be fluent in both Setswana and English, have a relevant degree and at least 5 years of senior management experience. [read post]