Search for: "Application of Hughes"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 11:30 am
Relying on Hughes v McCarthy, 734 F.3d 473 at 480, he set aside the order of the ALJ on both files. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:17 am
Brad Hughes, Esq. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Hughes. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:42 am
Hughes: The Legal Grinder established an office that is also a coffeehouse. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:28 am
On Wednesday 8 February 2023 the Court will hand down judgments in the following appeals: In the matter of an application by Clifford Peeples for Judicial Review) (Northern Ireland) and In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2023] UKSC 5. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
Questions were posed regarding all of the major social media applications including Facebook, You Tube, Twitter, LinkedIn and blogs. [read post]
Court Of Appeals For Federal Circuit Denies Eli Lilly’s Appeal, Opens Door for Testosterone Generics
5 Dec 2017, 12:29 pm
Hughes at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal No. 2016-2555. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:50 am
There were 119 applicants that did not make the final list.Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:07 am
If you want the latest scoop on these apps and more, Vicki Steiner, from the Hugh and Hazel Darling Law Library at UCLA, has created an amazing Apps for Legal Research LibGuide featuring links to tons of current mobile applications that may be of interest to both law students and lawyers. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
As the Federal Circuit continues to be divided, it is most interesting to consider the sides that have formed: Supporting Rehearing (and broader scope of CBM review, and broader 101 application): Chief Judge Prost and Judges Lourie, Dyk, Wallach, and Hughes Against Rehearing (for narrower CBM review and reduced 101 application): Judges Moore, Taranto, O’Malley, Reyna, Newman, and Chen. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
UPC Preparatory Committee seeking new "top-up" applicants | Nuances in the definition of accidental anticipation (T 1218/14) | What is your SEP "licensing concept"? [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:18 am
The application for leave to appeal was therefore refused. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:52 pm
Hughes cited to precedent from the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm
Jacob Howard, the lead sponsors of the 14th Amendment (making the Bill of Rights applicable to the states) in the House and Senate. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
However, as GuestKat Rose Hughes reports, according to the judge overseeing the German constitutional complaint to the UPC (Justice Huber), these allegations may be bulls***.In this guest report from Rien Broekstra and Gaëlle Béquet of Brinkhof (Amsterdam) (who represent Wiko in the parallel Dutch litigation), they detail the latest development in the ongoing FRAND wars, this time from Germany, concerning the requirements for a FRAND offer.Typically, in disputes of… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
The success (or lack thereof) of the filed applications is reviewed.The patent drawing requirements, and their fitness for purpose were discussed in another post by GuestKat Rose Hughes. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
”McIntyre wishes to contest the application of the policy to her on the ground that it violates Title IX and denies her equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
The final hearing was heard by Sir Hugh Bennett between 9 and 13 July 2012. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 9:36 am
On appeal, a divided Federal Circuit then affirmed, with Judge Reyna penning the majority opinion joined by Judge Hughes, and Judge O’Malley writing in dissent. [read post]
